<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gluue &#187; NYT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gluue.com/tag/nyt/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gluue.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>NY Times. Too Bad, Maybe.</title>
		<link>http://gluue.com/2010/02/ny-times-too-bad-maybe/</link>
		<comments>http://gluue.com/2010/02/ny-times-too-bad-maybe/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:05:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Paste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPad]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYT]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gluue.com/?p=1309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I semi-religiously read the NY Times online. it&#8217;s sometimes frustrating inside of a browser, but the writing is amazingly worth the effort. Even on the iPhone, it&#8217;s worth all the pinching to get at that great content. I have never in a decade of post-college adulthood subscribed to a physical newspaper. I have subscribed to [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I semi-religiously read the NY Times online. it&#8217;s sometimes frustrating inside of a browser, but the writing is amazingly worth the effort. Even on the iPhone, it&#8217;s worth all the pinching to get at that great content.</p>

	<p>I have never in a decade of post-college adulthood subscribed to a physical newspaper. I have subscribed to a few printed magazines (mostly as received gifts) but for more than a year have subscribed to none.</p>

	<p>However I&#8217;m what I would consider a voracious consumer of content. I read blogs, books (both virtual and digital) listen to podcasts, and lots of audiobooks. So it&#8217;s not that I lack the wherewithal, or the desire to read a daily newspaper.<span id="more-1309"></span></p>

	<p>It&#8217;s just never seemed rewarding enough for me to do so. Either cost, fussiness, or even the environmental concern have led me to skip it. So. When Apple announced the iPad I was excited. It seemed like I might finally be the archetypal adult sitting in the armchair with a cup of coffee reading the newspaper-but the new kind. The digital kind.</p>

	<p>Unfortunately I don&#8217;t think that I&#8217;m quite there yet. According to a link I picked up off of <a href="http://daringfireball.net/linked/2010/02/16/gawker">DF</a>, the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com">NYT</a> is thinking of charging $20-$30 per month for the content. Keep in mind these things:</p>

	<ul>
		<li>That equals potentially $360 per year.</li>
		<li>The 7 day a week print version for a <span class="caps">NYC</span> resident is only $305 per year.</li>
		<li>The web version is free</li>
		<li>I&#8217;m not one of those people who would normally care. If I want it, and I can afford it, I will buy it.</li>
	</ul>

	<p>But&#8230; This is a mess. I understand basic business. I understand profit. I don&#8217;t think anything in the world should be free. But I hate to see business plans that are poorly priced. A $5 product that sells a million units is much more powerful than a $30  product that sells a 100 units.</p>

	<p>Price is an intrinsically huge part of how a product is perceived in the marketplace. And for <span class="caps">NYT</span> to price the digital version of their product higher than the physical equivalent that requires ink, trees, postage, and personnel to produce seems like a big F.U. to our generation.</p>

	<p>It says, &#8220;you&#8217;re not doing it right.&#8221; It says &#8220;your way is an inconvenience to us, and you should be penalized.&#8221; I understand their fear. I understand their reluctance. I can relate to it in many ways. But unfortunately, none of that compels me to want to subscribe.</p>

	<p>It&#8217;s a shame to waste all that excitement I felt. I can only imagine I&#8217;m not the only one begging to finally be a new digital person who fits into an old media world.</p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gluue.com/2010/02/ny-times-too-bad-maybe/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 177/215 objects using disk

 Served from: gluue.com @ 2026-06-10 02:38:03 by W3 Total Cache -->