<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Gluue &#187; markups</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gluue.com/tag/markups/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gluue.com</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 14:23:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Printing Pixels</title>
		<link>http://gluue.com/2010/08/printing-pixels/</link>
		<comments>http://gluue.com/2010/08/printing-pixels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joe]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Ear to the ground]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[free ideas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cameron moll]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[markups]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gluue.com/?p=2322</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve always laughed at clients who insist on printing out websites for review. It&#8217;s like looking at a picture of a painting&#8230; The medium itself is what makes the thing what it is. Once you remove the media, the identity of the thing you&#8217;re reviewing is essentially lost. But when I saw this slide in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p><a href="http://www.slideshare.net/cameronmoll/good-vs-great-design"><img src="http://gluue.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Screen-shot-2010-08-05-at-9.23.50-AM.jpg" alt="Website marked up" title="Website marked up" width="499" height="374" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2324" /></a>I&#8217;ve always laughed at clients who insist on printing out websites for review. It&#8217;s like looking at a picture of a painting&#8230; The medium itself is what makes the thing what it is. Once you remove the media, the identity of the thing you&#8217;re reviewing is essentially lost. </p>

	<p>But when I saw this slide in the excellent slide deck called <a href="http://www.slideshare.net/cameronmoll/good-vs-great-design">Good vs. Great Design</a> by Cameron Moll I sort of wanted to print a website. Now I have no idea what Cameron is saying during this slide in the real presentation. Maybe he&#8217;s making fun of people who print websites too. But what I see is a tactile way to review content and hierarchy.</p>

	<p>There are lots of markup tools for online mockup reviews. But they all feel like using a butter knife to cut steak. You want to directly interact and scribble with your hands, not draw boxes and type text in Markerfelt. Why not print out a website big, stand 10 feet away and blur your eyes? We&#8217;ve been doing that stuff for print work for years. Maybe a change in perspective will help you focus more clearly on making the site read at a glance. Plus being able to doodle, sketch, and cross things out is always a liberating experience.</p>

]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://gluue.com/2010/08/printing-pixels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 182/193 objects using disk

 Served from: gluue.com @ 2026-06-09 17:22:29 by W3 Total Cache -->