<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screens, screens, more screens.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://gluue.com/2008/07/screens-screens-more-screens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://gluue.com/2008/07/screens-screens-more-screens/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2026 18:34:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.8.41</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://gluue.com/2008/07/screens-screens-more-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-22</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 16:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pasteinteractive.com/?p=98#comment-22</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hmm - OK. I guess we&#039;ll have to see it when it&#039;s here. I&#039;ve been using BP since the beginning and short of some &quot;sharing hiccups&quot; I find it useful for my own files as well as our small team. We barely rely on IM/Chat but do make plenty of use of ToDo lists etc. fwiw, One of the problems encountered w/ BP is LONG pages of content having no way to easily collapse information (think JS accordion style) so we can see an overview without being immediately bombarded by the details.

So bring it on. I&#039;d love to see what Staction brings to the table.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm &#8211; OK. I guess we&#8217;ll have to see it when it&#8217;s here. I&#8217;ve been using BP since the beginning and short of some &#8220;sharing hiccups&#8221; I find it useful for my own files as well as our small team. We barely rely on IM/Chat but do make plenty of use of ToDo lists etc. fwiw, One of the problems encountered w/ BP is <span class="caps">LONG</span> pages of content having no way to easily collapse information (think JS accordion style) so we can see an overview without being immediately bombarded by the details.</p>
<p>So bring it on. I&#8217;d love to see what Staction brings to the table.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paste Interactive</title>
		<link>http://gluue.com/2008/07/screens-screens-more-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-21</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paste Interactive]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 14:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pasteinteractive.com/?p=98#comment-21</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Kel, Actually I&#039;ve always really like BP. I consider it to be one of the few perfectly executed apps on the market. Not sure about the stuff added on to make it more like an intranet, but other than that... amazing. BC is also perfect in it&#039;s way. Execute something simply, and it will be solid, and durable. However, for advanced users, and people that live in their PM apps, it&#039;s a bit tedious. While Staction would be great for keeping track of personal todos and items, it&#039;s sweet spot is on communication in small groups. If you need to have tons of people with varying technical prowess huddle around a pm app, - BC is a good tool. If you need to share pages of simple content with people, or organize your thoughts, BP is perfect. If you need to rapidly communicate, swap files, and todos, Staction is going to scratch your itch.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kel, Actually I&#8217;ve always really like BP. I consider it to be one of the few perfectly executed apps on the market. Not sure about the stuff added on to make it more like an intranet, but other than that&#8230; amazing. BC is also perfect in it&#8217;s way. Execute something simply, and it will be solid, and durable. However, for advanced users, and people that live in their PM apps, it&#8217;s a bit tedious. While Staction would be great for keeping track of personal todos and items, it&#8217;s sweet spot is on communication in small groups. If you need to have tons of people with varying technical prowess huddle around a pm app, &#8211; BC is a good tool. If you need to share pages of simple content with people, or organize your thoughts, BP is perfect. If you need to rapidly communicate, swap files, and todos, Staction is going to scratch your itch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kel</title>
		<link>http://gluue.com/2008/07/screens-screens-more-screens/comment-page-1/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pasteinteractive.com/?p=98#comment-20</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;From the homepage of the most popular web based PM app&quot; - I know, I know... pick me. :-)  OK, seriously - assuming this PM app you mention is 37BC, then I&#039;d hope your new app might be better than 37BP, yes?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;From the homepage of the most popular web based PM app&#8221; &#8211; I know, I know&#8230; pick me. <img src="http://gluue.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif" alt=":-)" class="wp-smiley" />   OK, seriously &#8211; assuming this PM app you mention is 37BC, then I&#8217;d hope your new app might be better than 37BP, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 195/198 objects using disk

 Served from: gluue.com @ 2026-04-22 13:23:56 by W3 Total Cache -->